<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Don&#8217;t spread this around, but global warming is really . . .</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thinkfree.freedomblogging.com/2009/06/29/dont-spread-this-around-but-global-warming-is-really/1571/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thinkfree.freedomblogging.com/2009/06/29/dont-spread-this-around-but-global-warming-is-really/1571/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 14:50:38 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dan R</title>
		<link>http://thinkfree.freedomblogging.com/2009/06/29/dont-spread-this-around-but-global-warming-is-really/1571/#comment-287</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan R</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 22:20:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkfree.freedomblogging.com/?p=1571#comment-287</guid>
		<description>The bureaucrats in government has identified AGW as a review stream, science be damned.  The agencies created to fight a false threat have nothing but self interest at heart.  Politicians see it as a way to wield more power.  What puzzles me is how the EPA can have an endangerment finding for a compound (CO2) we exhale.  It seems they cannot tell the difference between a toxic substance and one that is not.
Opposition to the green mantra will not be allowed!  All will bow to the political will! Only when political pockets are lined with enough of our cash will we Al Gore mention he forgot to say "political science" when saying the science has been decided.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The bureaucrats in government has identified AGW as a review stream, science be damned.  The agencies created to fight a false threat have nothing but self interest at heart.  Politicians see it as a way to wield more power.  What puzzles me is how the EPA can have an endangerment finding for a compound (CO2) we exhale.  It seems they cannot tell the difference between a toxic substance and one that is not.<br />
Opposition to the green mantra will not be allowed!  All will bow to the political will! Only when political pockets are lined with enough of our cash will we Al Gore mention he forgot to say &#8220;political science&#8221; when saying the science has been decided.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://thinkfree.freedomblogging.com/2009/06/29/dont-spread-this-around-but-global-warming-is-really/1571/#comment-285</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 16:12:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkfree.freedomblogging.com/?p=1571#comment-285</guid>
		<description>I can tell you (from first hand knowledge) that the liberals are suppressing the science to better their agenda.  Anyone who does not know that most of the scientists are liberally biased is living in denial.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can tell you (from first hand knowledge) that the liberals are suppressing the science to better their agenda.  Anyone who does not know that most of the scientists are liberally biased is living in denial.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: L Isaacs</title>
		<link>http://thinkfree.freedomblogging.com/2009/06/29/dont-spread-this-around-but-global-warming-is-really/1571/#comment-283</link>
		<dc:creator>L Isaacs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 17:15:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkfree.freedomblogging.com/?p=1571#comment-283</guid>
		<description>Before the OC register makes such an accusation about alarmism, it should present the views of the majority of scientists qualified to speak about the subject of global warming.  Since most members of the public have no time or the expertise to read the scientific articles on the subject, then the OC should show more responsibility by presenting a more balanced view.
You do your readers an injustice when your report is so lopsided.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Before the OC register makes such an accusation about alarmism, it should present the views of the majority of scientists qualified to speak about the subject of global warming.  Since most members of the public have no time or the expertise to read the scientific articles on the subject, then the OC should show more responsibility by presenting a more balanced view.<br />
You do your readers an injustice when your report is so lopsided.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>