

I miss the halcyon days when people were actually held accountable for their own actions. Alas, today, people can do whatever they want and when it comes time to pay the piper for their behavior, they can just sue someone else.
Take for example the case of Betty Bullock.
Betty died of lung cancer in 2003 at the age of 64. She had been a longtime smoker, starting at the age of 17, starting with Marlboros and later turning to Benson & Hedges, both Philip Morris products.
That means she did not start smoking until well after the health risks of smoking became widely known. Less than 10 years after she started smoking, warnings were required on every cigarette package. Still, Betty ignored the warnings and continued to smoke.
But no matter in today’s legal climate.
In April 2001, Betty sued Philip Morris. In 2002, a jury awarded $750,000 in damages, $100,000 for pain and suffering and an unbelievable $28 billion in punitive damages.
That’s right, $28 billion.
All because Betty chose to ignore the warnings about the dangers of cigarettes.
A judge reduced the amount to a meager $28 million.
Last year, the 2nd U.S. District Court of Appeal reversed the jury decision on punitive damages.
On Monday, a jury in Los Angeles Superior Court issued a new verdict and awarded Betty’s daughter, Jodie Bullock, $13.8 million.
While much better than the $28 billion initially award, this $13.8 million sum is still phenomenal. This money is not for damages to Betty. This is an amount of money meant to punish the cigarette maker because Betty chose to smoke.
Betty had every right to smoke but she had no right to blame the maker of the cigarettes for her decision. She could have stopped at anytime but chose not to.
Welcome to the new America. Do what you want and then sue someone when your behavior gets you in trouble.
This has to be the most outrageous thing I have read in a long time.
In a Townhall.com blog, Meredith Jessup reported that at a town hall meeting with U.S. Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee, D-Texas, perhaps the dimmest bulb in the Congress, a woman claiming to be a doctor expressed her support for Obama’s health care plan.
Turns out, the name “Dr. Roxana Mayer” doesn’t appear in the database maintained by the Texas Medical Board, a registry of all licensed doctors in the state. But the name “Roxana Mayer” does show up on Barack Obama’s website as a Texas Delegate for Obama–a small bit of information the Chronicle was aware of, but didn’t report in its story.
Are the Democrats so desperate they have to hire fake doctors to sell their socialized medicine plan?
Read the full blog post here.
Bank of America recently paid a record-breaking $33 million to the federal government to settle regulator claims that it “misled investors about bonus payments while buying Merrill Lynch & Co.” That’s right, regulators, you show that evil corporation who is boss. By, um, forcing the misled investors to pay you. Wait a second…
Randall Holcombe also noticed this curious penalty:
So, as I read the story, the SEC says that Bank of America executives concealed information from its shareholders prior to the shareholder vote to merge, harming those shareholders. Therefore, the same shareholders who were harmed by the concealment now have to pay another $33 million. Is this justice?
I’ll take a stab: nope.
History has successfully managed to repeat itself. Don Boudreaux noted that Los Angeles will be shilling out $30 million to keep Cirque du Soleil playing in town and to perfect the similarities between America and the crumbling Roman Empire.
So it’s finally come to pass – America has embarked on the same road down which ancient Rome marched to its ruin: Uncle Sam not only subsidizes bread (by subsidizing wheat production) but now also circuses.
As my friend David Gasten asks in an e-mail, “if the Cirque du Soleil is so popular, then why does it need to be subsidized? They didn’t need to subsidize Michael Jackson’s funeral.” True dat!
Worth noting: the city did subsidize Jackson’s funeral, to the tune of roughly $1.4 million.